Խ․ Աբովյանի անվան հայկական պետական մանկավարժական համալսարան
Given peculiarity of Armenian history, the Armenian political thought for centuries debated around geopolitical orientation between neighboring great powers. In post-Soviet reflections, however, the emphasis has been moved towards selfreliance, and the very principle of political orientation was questioned. The attitude towards Israel Ori, whose name was viewed as a symbol of the principle of orientation, became the locums for determining the political-ideological disposition of debater, as well as understanding their approaches towards different concepts of national identity. A brief comparison between the conceptual paradigms of two renowned historians Ashot Hovhannisyan (1887-1972) and Leo (Arakel Babakhanyan, 1860-1932) in relation to their attitude towards Israel Ori aims to demonstrate that questioning of the very principle of orientation has much deeper roots in Armenian historical studies than commonly is believed. It also illuminates the complex relationship between principle of orientation and desired model of social structure of so-ciety, which these two classics have revealed in rather different ways.
Երևան
oai:arar.sci.am:370198
Apr 16, 2024
Feb 16, 2024
10
https://arar.sci.am/publication/400004
Edition name | Date |
---|---|
Voskanian, Ashot, On Two Factors of National Identity: Orientation and Social Structure of Society | Apr 16, 2024 |
Ohanyan, Karina
Fauziati, Endang Suharyanto, Suharyanto Syahrullah, Asep Shofian Pradana, Wahyu Aji Nurcholis, Irwan
Khrypko, Svitlana Yang, Qi Stoliarchuk, Olesia Prorok, Nataliia Spudka, Iryna Kalishchuk, Svitlana Lobanchuk, Olena Mishchenko-Driuchylo, Viktoriia
Dumanyan, Sona
Vandamme, Fernand Jozef
Mikhaliova, Tatsiana
Tshughuryan, Armen Barati, Reza