սեղմիր այստեղ կապին հետևելու համար
Խ․ Աբովյանի անվան հայկական պետական մանկավարժական համալսարան
The article is devoted to the analysis of some of the features and characteristics of the most popular database systems: Web of Science and Scopus; as well as to the study of the improvement of the qualitative aspects of scholarly journals considering their requirements the given systems put forth. It touches upon the ideas that scholarly journals should oversee their quality and care for their academic reputation which will inevitably result in the increase of quality citations and a positive change in their scientometric status. In conclusion, the article states: the 2 databases prove that despite all the shortcomings, the operating mechanism that evaluates journals, as well as gets regulated and determined by the number of citations, remains the only tool providing a more or less objective criterion that guides academic and related institutions during the process of evaluating researchers or the quality of researches.
Երևան
oai:arar.sci.am:370035
Apr 16, 2024
Feb 14, 2024
48
https://arar.sci.am/publication/399832
Հրատարակության անուն | Ամսաթիվ |
---|---|
Gevorgyan, Ashot, Advanced Scientometric Databases as an Objective Criterion of Scientific Activities | Apr 16, 2024 |
Kryshtanovych, Svitlana Tieliezhkina, Olesia Chesnokova, Maryna Yemelianenko, Yevheniia Kravchenko, Valentyna
Ortynskyi, Volodymyr Shamrayeva, Valentina Zeman, Ihor Lisna, Ivanna Valetska, Oksana
Kolisnichenko, Roman Tsumariev, Marat Melnyk, Nadiia Gorban, Iryna Marushko, Nadiia
Slyvka, Stepan Harasymiv, Taras Levytska, Oksana Kolyba, Maksym Panchenko, Snizhana
Hakim, Lukman Abdullah, Irwan Sa’adah, Nurus
Baurina, Svetlana Pashkovskaya, Margatita Nazarova, Elena
Aleksandrova, Oksana Samoilenko, Olexandra Osadcha, Svitlana Grybynenko, Julia Nosulya, Anatoliy