սեղմիր այստեղ կապին հետևելու համար
Խ․ Աբովյանի անվան հայկական պետական մանկավարժական համալսարան
The article examines the modern relationship between the interaction of the court and the notary when taking measures to ensure evidence. In particular, it is indicated that when providing evidence, these bodies are guided by the norms of civil procedural legislation and implement similar goals aimed at fixing factual circumstances of legal significance in a procedural form. It is emphasized that their competence touches, moreover, the notary, as it were, replaces the court in the implementation of interim measures. One of the tasks of the effective activity of the notary is to relieve the judicial system from the consideration of local and timeconsuming issues, which are solved, as a rule, without the application of the principle of adversarial parties, including the provision of evidence on the Internet. Thus, the potential of unloading the court is excluded from its competence to solve problems that do not relate to the administration of justice.
Երևան
oai:arar.sci.am:372486
Apr 16, 2024
Apr 4, 2024
7
https://arar.sci.am/publication/402379
Հրատարակության անուն | Ամսաթիվ |
---|---|
Begichev, Alexander, Philosophical and Theoretical Aspects of Court-Notary Interaction: Current Relationships in the Provision of Evidence | Apr 16, 2024 |
Kolisnichenko, Roman Tsumariev, Marat Melnyk, Nadiia Gorban, Iryna Marushko, Nadiia
Romashov, Roman Rakova, Elena Kovalev, Victor
Ortynskyi, Volodymyr Shamrayeva, Valentina Zeman, Ihor Lisna, Ivanna Valetska, Oksana
Slyvka, Stepan Harasymiv, Taras Levytska, Oksana Kolyba, Maksym Panchenko, Snizhana
Miashchanava, Maryia Frolova, Evgenia E.
Rusakova, Ekaterina P. Frolova, Evgenia E.
Mamychev, Alexey Garashko, Anna Kazachanskaya, Elena
Malinovsky, Alexei Dobrotvorsky, Pavel