The article examines the modern relationship between the interaction of the court and the notary when taking measures to ensure evidence. In particular, it is indicated that when providing evidence, these bodies are guided by the norms of civil procedural legislation and implement similar goals aimed at fixing factual circumstances of legal significance in a procedural form. It is emphasized that their competence touches, moreover, the notary, as it were, replaces the court in the implementation of interim measures. One of the tasks of the effective activity of the notary is to relieve the judicial system from the consideration of local and timeconsuming issues, which are solved, as a rule, without the application of the principle of adversarial parties, including the provision of evidence on the Internet. Thus, the potential of unloading the court is excluded from its competence to solve problems that do not relate to the administration of justice.

Երևան

pdf

en

Ամսագրի կամ հրապարակման վերնագիր:

Հրապարակման ամսաթիվ:

Հատոր:

Համար:

ISSN:

Պաշտոնական URL:

Վերնագիր:

Ստեղծողը:

Համատեղ հեղինակները:

Խորագիր:

Չվերահսկվող բանալի բառեր:

Ծածկույթ:

Ամփոփում:

Հրատարակության վայրը:

Հրատարակիչ:

Տեսակ:

Ձևաչափ:

Լեզու: