Խ․ Աբովյանի անվան հայկական պետական մանկավարժական համալսարան
The subject of this article is the philosophical views of representatives of the legal tradition of the late period of the Russian Empire regarding the status of the Grand Duchy of Finland. The objective of this work is to conduct a philo-sophical and legal assessment of the views of various Russian legal theorists.This study uses philosophical cognitionmethods compris-ing, firstly, a formal dogmatic method for analysing legal in-struments related to the legal status of the Grand Duchy of Finland, and secondly, a hermeneutic method in relation to the studied works of Russian legal theorists. A concrete his-torical method is also used.The main result of this article is to identify contradictions in the philosophical views of Russian legal theorists on the legal status of the Grand Duchy of Finland and determine all the contributing factors.The main conclusion drawn in this article is that the philo-sophical and theoretical views of representatives of the Rus-sian legal tradition were significantly influenced by their ini-tial objectives. Researchers first sought to refute the existence of a union between the Russian Empire and the Grand Duchy of Finland, which sidelined and hindered the cognition of the legal nature of relations between Russia and Finland.
Երևան
oai:arar.sci.am:372299
Apr 16, 2024
Apr 4, 2024
1
https://arar.sci.am/publication/402254
Kolisnichenko, Roman Tsumariev, Marat Melnyk, Nadiia Gorban, Iryna Marushko, Nadiia
Kolosov, Igor Konnov, Valeriy Mukienko, Igor
Romashov, Roman Rakova, Elena Kovalev, Victor
Ordoukhanian, Emile Գլխ. խմբ.՝ Գ․ Ա․ Պողոսյան
Safrastyan, Ruben
Osipov, Vladimir Քասունի, Երուանդ հ., 1937- [հիմնադիր խմբագիր՝ 1970-1984] Կռանեան, Անդրանիկ ծ. վրդ., 1929-2017 [1991-2017] Տագէսեան, Անդրանիկ, 1960- [2018-]