Խ․ Աբովյանի անվան հայկական պետական մանկավարժական համալսարան
The article is an evaluation of Pollock‟s anti-existentialist argument and its place in the contemporary debates about Existentialism. We demonstrate that the main contemporary objections to Pollock‟s Anti-Existentialism can be grouped into two argumentative directions: (1) Pollock‟s supposed confusion of in-ner and outer truth (Fine, Speaks); (2) Pollock‟s assumption that there is such state of affairs as Socrates‟s not existing(Kroon). We also introduce an argument against Pollock`s crucial argumentative stepagainst existentialism.
Երևան
oai:arar.sci.am:372016
Oct 8, 2025
Mar 28, 2024
225
https://arar.sci.am/publication/401866
| Հրատարակության անուն | Ամսաթիվ |
|---|---|
| Bondarenko, Oleh, Between Existentialism and Anti-Existentialism | Oct 8, 2025 |
Oganyan, Kadzhik Oganyan, Karina Pyzh, Vladimir Ermilova, Victoria Chudaev, Mihail
Martyniuk, Mykhailo Kyrylenko, Kateryna Krymets, Liudmyla Makhometa, Tetiana Madi, Halyna
Branskij, Vladimir Oganyan, Kadzhik M. Oganyan, Karina K.
Oganyan, Kadzhik M. Pyzh, Vladimir Petrović, Sergey Oganyan, Karina K.
Romashov, Roman Rakova, Elena Kovalev, Victor
Bystriantsev, Sergei Bagandova, Elmira Yeghiazaryan, Syuzanna Bystriantsev, Peresvet Pleshkov, Evgeny Saakyan, Ishkhan
Ivanyshyn, Petro Yolkina, Larysa Osmak, Nina