Խ․ Աբովյանի անվան հայկական պետական մանկավարժական համալսարան
The article is an evaluation of Pollock‟s anti-existentialist argument and its place in the contemporary debates about Existentialism. We demonstrate that the main contemporary objections to Pollock‟s Anti-Existentialism can be grouped into two argumentative directions: (1) Pollock‟s supposed confusion of in-ner and outer truth (Fine, Speaks); (2) Pollock‟s assumption that there is such state of affairs as Socrates‟s not existing(Kroon). We also introduce an argument against Pollock`s crucial argumentative stepagainst existentialism.
Երևան
oai:arar.sci.am:372016
Apr 16, 2024
Mar 28, 2024
8
https://arar.sci.am/publication/401866
Edition name | Date |
---|---|
Bondarenko, Oleh, Between Existentialism and Anti-Existentialism | Apr 16, 2024 |
Oganyan, Kadzhik Oganyan, Karina Pyzh, Vladimir Ermilova, Victoria Chudaev, Mihail
Martyniuk, Mykhailo Kyrylenko, Kateryna Krymets, Liudmyla Makhometa, Tetiana Madi, Halyna
Oganyan, Kadzhik M. Pyzh, Vladimir Petrović, Sergey Oganyan, Karina K.
Branskij, Vladimir Oganyan, Kadzhik M. Oganyan, Karina K.
Romashov, Roman Rakova, Elena Kovalev, Victor
Monin, Maxim Ledeneva, Elena Shadrina, Elena
Mnatsakanyan, Yeva