@misc{Fauziati_Endang_Hate,
 author={Fauziati, Endang and Suharyanto, Suharyanto and Syahrullah, Asep Shofian and Pradana, Wahyu Aji and Nurcholis, Irwan},
 address={Երևան},
 howpublished={online},
 publisher={Տիգրան Մեծ},
 language={en},
 abstract={This study aims to: (1) describe the linguistic forms typically used in hate speech; (2) reveal the inter-pretation and intention of hate speech,and (3) propose its pedagogical implication. This was descriptive qualitative research with contentand a philosophicanalysis approach. The data were excerpts containing hate language produced by figurescollected from YouTube videos. The hate speech was linguistically manifested through the use of swear words, mental abnormality terms, the animal metaphor, insults which refer to characters,Arabicterms withnegative meaning, and nicknames that call out physical charac-teristics. According to the interpretation in the Indonesian context, the speakers use hate language to vent negative feelings, insult, condemn, accuse, show disagreement, show dissatisfaction, wish bad luck, and threaten.Thehate language appears to be an Indonesianphenomenon of language use, however, its forms and functionsare determined by the contextual or philosophic background of the users.Some hate language in this paper was found to mask the speakers‟defeat and incapability against the target of hate.},
 title={Hate Language Produced by Indonesian Figures in Social Media: From Philosophical Perspectives},
 type={Հոդված},
 keywords={Philosophy of language},
}